The Cautious Approach - Police cautions and the impact on youth reoffending This research paper examines the characteristics that impacted on a young person aged receiving a caution or a charge from police between 1 April and 31 Marchand their reoffending behaviour over the following 12 months. The publication can be found here. This fact sheet examines changes in the first recorded offences for young offenders over the last five years, including comparisons of offence types and seriousness. This fact sheet provides information about young offenders who offend with one or more other people over the past 12 months, including data on demographics and offence types.
Includes only those projects that had been completed and have been evaluated Source: Many project evaluations failed to distinguish between short, medium or long-term outcomes and therefore either focused entirely on outputs or made unsupported assertions about the impact of their work.
None of these findings are intended as specific criticisms of the managers of the funded projects, per se. For example, respondents to a national survey of crime prevention professionals conducted as a part of the NCCPP review supported the view that, for the most part, community-based organisations have limited access to adequate support, lack the internal ability to undertake evaluation or the capacity to engage third parties to assist them in undertaking evaluation activities.
There were also concerns as to the extent to which organisations have access to useful information and resources to assist them in undertaking an evaluation. Many community-based organisations funded by the NCCPP and the POCA funding program reported having difficulties providing evidence of the effectiveness or otherwise of their crime prevention projects.
Meeting the requirements for evaluation was one of the common challenges identified by project managers in the qualitative surveys: Project managers reported difficulties accessing data on key outcomes such as recorded crime data for locations or individuals targeted by the project.
Project managers were not always sure how to collect data on outcomes for participants and empirically tested data collection tools eg participant questionnaires were not readily available to community-based organisations.
Several community-based organisations reported that they did not have the technical skills or capacity to collect and analyse appropriate evidence, were not best placed to undertake the evaluation and required additional support and guidance from the funding body.
While many organisations endeavoured to contract external evaluators to evaluate their project, consultants were not always available, did not have the necessary subject matter knowledge or expertise, or were reluctant to be engaged for the life of the project for what amounted to a relatively small amount of funding.
Funding was short-term and non-recurring and for many projects especially those aiming to address the behaviour of individualsevidence of a reduction or delay in criminal activity may only start to emerge years after the funding and hence after the evaluation had ended. There was some resistance to allocating resources to the evaluation, including investing time in regular data collection, instead of service delivery.
Project managers were encouraged to allocate 10 percent of the overall project budget to evaluation, but some project managers reported spending large amounts of time and resources reporting on expenditure as part of the funding agreement—time that could have otherwise been allocated to evaluation.
This experience demonstrates that imposing conventional evaluation requirements on local organisations as a mandatory requirement within a project funding arrangement does not guarantee that project activities will be rigorously evaluated.
Rather, it can increase resistance to evaluation because of the perceived additional administrative burden and may adversely impact upon the quality of service delivery. Even when an evaluation has been successfully undertaken, another challenge for evaluators, policymakers and practitioners has been transferring the knowledge gained from research and evaluation into more effective crime prevention policy and practice.
For example, few of the evaluations produced by NCCPP funding recipients have been publicly released and those that have were not widely disseminated to other grant recipients.
This is not uncommon for local crime prevention programs. As a result, ineffective projects are often replicated because of the lack of readily available evidence demonstrating that the chosen approach was not the most effective, or because there is insufficient evidence to convince decision makers Homel et al.
Recommendations for improving the level and quality of crime prevention evaluation These challenges are not insurmountable. Several recommendations for improving the level and quality of crime prevention evaluation in Australia are outlined in the remainder of this paper.Crime and justice Figures on crime levels and trends for England and Wales based primarily on two sets of statistics: the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) and police recorded crime data.
On this page. The Crime Statistics Agency regularly publishes research and evaluation papers on key topics in crime and criminal justice. Publications can be viewed by clicking on one of the topic areas below.
Criminal Justice Program Evaluation Evaluations are increasingly important to help guide monetary and administrative decisions regarding criminal justice programs.
As resources continue to decline in tough budget years, evaluations will likely become even more important. crime statistics, and in order to improve the relevance of the data on such offences, new solutions need to be developed.
Chapter 5, shifting to the next stage of the criminal justice system, presents data on responses of the criminal justice system, including an innovation. Crime statistics ought to be evaluated in light of a number of factors that can mislead social constructions of offending.
Conclusions drawn from individual data sets are to be evaluated against the dark figure of crime and commonly held myths.
Statistical data are mostly gathered and interpreted to. The Crime Statistics Agency Information about research and evaluation services provided by the Crime Statistics Agency.
Research agenda. Research agenda. View the Crime Statistics Agency's research priorities for About the data. How the data is collected and processed.